Use the filter below to find what you're looking for:
This is the lay summary for the main report for this project.
A report of the role of patients and public in implementation of the Strategy.
This is the full report of the work summarised in Appendix Two.
A report of the implementation of the international component of the Strategy and explores challenges to the UK in the global AMR policy
landscape.
A report of the innovation challenges in the biopharma industry response to AMR.
A systematic review of the impact of guidelines and recommendations on the level and patterns of antimicrobial use in livestock and companion animals.
A systematic review of evidence of antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in the food chain.
A report of our evaluation of the implementation of the Strategy in the food chain.
A report of our evaluation of the use of data to effect change in implementation of the Strategy.
This report is a systematic review of human and animal health surveillance systems in the AMR context.
This report covers the implementation of the Strategy in the four countries of the UK and includes case studies of implementation of the Strategy at local level in both human health and animal health.
Appendix Three is a systematic review and meta-analysis of rapid diagnostic tests for bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing in hospitals. This report is not yet available for publication.
This is the main report for this project and provides a brief overview of our findings across the entire project. Also see the twelve associated Appendix reports and the lay summary, all of which were published in December 2019.
The Overview report for this project refers to a logic model that we developed as part of the scoping study for this work, which demonstrates the complex nature of the Strategy.
Today, there are many forms of collaborative research practice, including co-production, co-design, co-creation, stakeholder and public engagement, etc. They reflect a very diverse set of motivations, activities, identities and discourses about how research interacts with the rest of society. Here we use ‘co-production’ as shorthand to discuss these practices, but acknowledge the diversity and differences in the above.